ObamaOdrama

Newly minted and demoted Democrat, Arlen Specter, is again showing what lengths he will go to in order to remain a career politician.

Sen. Arlen Specter says the “prospects are pretty good” for a compromise on legislation making it easier for workers to form union.

Specter had come out against the bill in March, disappointing labor leaders. They had hoped he would be the crucial 60th vote needed to overcome an expected GOP filibuster of the Employee Free Choice Act.

But Specter has since switched from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party, and he said Thursday that he’s been meeting with labor leaders and fellow senators in hopes of coming up with a compromise he could support.

Get used to making more of those compromises, Specter… you have a long way to go before you earn one Democrat vote.

Apparently the buy black movement is growing and there are real consequences if you don’t.

Joyce Johnson, the former president and CEO of the nonprofit Black Equity Alliance, said its board of directors ousted her after she endorsed Bloomberg in March.

Bloomberg, an independent, could find himself running against Democratic city Comptroller Bill Thompson, who is black.

Johnson said a board member told her “it would not look good” for the president of the BEA to endorse Bloomberg.

BEA, which supports black and poor communities in the city, objected because Bloomberg is “white and Jewish,” according to a suit Johnson has filed in Manhattan Supreme Court.

She alleged the organization wants to “thwart, even by unlawful means, if necessary, the re-election of Mayor Bloomberg based on his race.”

Buying black and selling out blacks. Progress indeed.

During a weekly news conference, the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi faced some “enhanced” questioning by the press. Crumbling under the intense scrutiny, Pelosi instinctively attacked the Central Intelligence Agency and Bush administration in her own defense.

“Yes I am saying the CIA was misleading the Congress and at the same time the (Bush) administration was misleading the Congress on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, to which I said that this intelligence doesn’t support the imminent threat,” Pelosi said at her weekly news conference.

“Every step of the way the administration was misleading the Congress and that is the issue and that’s why we need a truth commission,” she added.

Under a barrage of questioning, Pelosi also again adamantly insisted that she was not aware that waterboarding or other enhanced interrogation techniques were being used on terrorism suspects and

“I am telling you they told me they approved these and said they wanted to use them but said they were not using waterboarding,” she said.

Ironically, Nancy didn’t suspect anything as the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee in 2002 when she was “informed” by the CIA they have the legal right to use these enhanced interrogation techniques but haven’t implemented them yet… or so SHE says.

Why didn’t she request or attend any further briefing on interrogation techniques while a member of the Intelligence Committee? Why didn’t she personally raise objection to the use of waterboarding when it was a fact a couple months later? Why didn’t she try to block funding for the C.I.A. programs associated with enhanced interrogation techniques?

“No letter could change the policy. It was clear we had to change the leadership in Congress and in the White House. That was my job — the Congress part.”

Oh, I see… Nancy was too busy campaigning.

Somehow, everyone around Nancy Pelosi seemed to know that the CIA was using waterboarding as an enhanced interrogation technique except for Nancy herself…

A top aide to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi attended a CIA briefing in early 2003 in which it was made clear that waterboarding and other harsh techniques were being used in the interrogation of an alleged al-Qaeda operative, according to documents the CIA released to Congress on Thursday.

Pelosi has insisted that she was not directly briefed by Bush administration officials that the practice was being actively employed. But Michael Sheehy, a top Pelosi aide, was present for a classified briefing that included Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.), then the ranking minority member of the House intelligence committee, at which agency officials discussed the use of waterboarding on terrorism suspect Abu Zubaida.

A Democratic source acknowledged yesterday that it is almost certain that Pelosi would have learned about the use of waterboarding from Sheehy. Pelosi herself acknowledged in a December 2007 statement that she was aware that Harman had learned of the waterboarding and had objected in a letter to the CIA’s top counsel.

“It was my understanding at that time that Congresswoman Harman filed a letter in early 2003 to the CIA to protest the use of such techniques, a protest with which I concurred,” Pelosi said in the Dec. 9, 2007, statement.

Plausible deniability… isn’t it great?

In light of newly released CIA documents showing Nancy Pelosi was one of the first members of Congress briefed on the use of enhanced interrogation techniques back in Sept. 2002, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi quickly released the following press statement:

“Of the forty CIA briefings to Congress reported recently in the press, I was only briefed once, on September 4, 2002, as I have previously stated. As I said in my statement of December 9, 2007: ‘I was briefed on interrogation techniques the Administration was considering using in the future. The Administration advised that legal counsel for both the CIA and the Department of Justice had concluded that the techniques were legal.’ I had no further briefings on the techniques.

“My understanding of the briefing I received is consistent with the description that CIA General Counsel Scott Muller provided to Congresswoman Jane Harman in a letter dated February 28, 2003, which states: ‘As we informed both you and the leadership of the Intelligence Committees last September, a number of Executive Branch lawyers including lawyers from the Department of Justice participated in the determination that, in the appropriate circumstances, the use of these techniques is fully consistent with U.S. law.’ As reported in the press, the accompanying memo from CIA Director Panetta concedes that the descriptions provided by the CIA may not be accurate.”

Pelosi has less regard for the truth than the CIA did for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.